Comparison PAPI and CAPI methods in data collection : an application of technology acceptance model (TAM)

Authors

  • lisa wati Padjadjaran University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52661/j_ict.v5i1.153

Keywords:

perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude, CAPI, PAPI

Abstract

This research aims to comparative analysis about technology acceptance model (TAM) variables;  perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and attitude (ATT) of interviewers in using conventional paper and pencil interview (PAPI) and computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) as data collection methods. The data were collected from two groups of interviewer, with a total of 334 interviewers. Analyses were conducted within each group and then compared using t-test using JASP 0.17.2.1. The findings showed that the two groups of PAPI and CAPI interviewers differed in their usage of survey methods. This research will assist organizations in planning the transformation of survey methods from PAPI to CAPI. It will also contribute to the understanding of the differences in interviewers' perceptions towards these two data collection methods.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-09

How to Cite

wati, lisa. (2023). Comparison PAPI and CAPI methods in data collection : an application of technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Informatics and Communication Technology (JICT), 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.52661/j_ict.v5i1.153

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 lisa wati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.